|
7
|
Facts About the UIG
|
|
7.1
|
What is the Background?
|
|
|
The effectiveness of an industry's EDI
program depends on how well the accepted standards comply to that industry's specific
needs.
For the Electric and Combination Utility Industry, those needs are being
addressed, within the ANSI ASC Xl 2 standards, by the active involvement of the Utility
Industry Group. |
|
7.2
|
What Function Does the UIG
Serve?
|
|
|
The function of the Utility Industry
Group is
- To represent Electric, Gas, and Combination Utilities, their suppliers, their customers,
and other interested parties as an Industry Action Group to ASC X12, specifically in the
standards-setting process, for their Electronic Data Interchange business needs.
- To encourage, promote, and establish conventions for the use of ASC X12 standards as the
"recommended" method of EDI. To develop and coordinate, as required,
implementation guidelines and tools to promote the growth and timely implementation of
Electronic Commerce/EDI within the industry.
- To provide a forum for the exchange of ideas related to Electronic Commerce/EDI and its
influence on the business needs of the industry.
The UIG works with industry associations and their members to facilitate
implementation of Electronic Commerce/EDI in the Utility Industry. |
|
7.3 |
Who are the Members of the UIG?
|
|
|
Utility Industry Group full membership is
open to Electric, Gas, and Combination Utilities, their suppliers, their customers, and
supplier group representatives. |
|
7.4 |
What is the UIG's relationship to the American National
Standard Institute?
|
|
|
The American National Standard Institute
(ANSI) through its accredited standards committee X12 develops National Standards for
Electronic Data Interchange.
The UIG does not set standards, rather it participates in the ANSI process
that sets the cross-industry standards, providing the Utility Industrys input for
our business needs.
The UIG provides guidelines that may assist other Utilities using the
standards to benefit more fully from EDI. |
|
7.5 |
Should I Join the UIG?
|
|
|
If your company is an Electric, Gas, or
Combination Utility,
If your company is a Refuse, Sewer, or Water Utility,
If your company supplies goods or services to this Industry, or
If your company is a customer of an Electric, Gas, or Combination Utility,
You should join the UIG. |
|
|
The UIG is helping its members use
Electronic Commerce/EDI to:
- Achieve more timely delivery of business transactions that can reduce lead time and the
overall stock replenishment cycle.
- Reduce material costs associated with printing, mailing and handling of paper based
transactions.
- Improve cash flow due to reduced inventory and more timely invoicing and payment.
- Improve business efficiency due to the more complete, timely and accurate use of
information.
|
|
|
The path to a successful implementation of
EDI has been blazed by todays members of the UIG. We are looking forward to
welcoming you to our effort. Only by participating can you benefit fully from the
cumulative experience of the UIG. You will also assure that the standards will accurately
reflect your specific business needs. |
|
7.6 |
UIG Charter |
|
|
The UIG Charter is a living document which is
revised as the needs of the organization evolve. The Name, Function, and Purpose sections
of the Charter are reproduced here; the current revision of the Charter may be viewed on
the UIG World Wide Web site: www.uig.org. |
|
|
- 1. Name
This organization shall be called the Utility Industry Group (UIG).
|
|
|
- 2.1 Function
The function of the Utility Industry Group is to:
|
|
|
2.1.1
Represent Electric, Gas, and Combination Utilities, their suppliers, their customers, and
other interested parties as an Industry Action Group to ASC X12, specifically in the
standards-setting process, for their Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) business needs.
|
|
|
2.1.2
Encourage promote and establish conventions for the use of ASC X12 standards as the
"recommended" method of EDI.
|
|
|
2.1.3
Develop and coordinate, as required, implementation guidelines and tools to promote the
growth and timely implementation of EDI within the industry.
|
|
|
2.1.4
Provide a forum for the exchange of ideas related to EDI and its influence on the business
needs of the industry.
|
|
|
2.1.5
Represent the Edison Electric Institute (EEI) and its members to facilitate implementation
of EDI in the Utility industry.
|
|
|
2.2.1
Comply with federal and state antitrust laws and trade regulations promulgated thereunder.
|
|
|
2.2.2
Specifically prohibit its Members, Directors and elected Officers or staff from engaging
in any activity or conduct which has the effect, intent, or even the appearance of
restraining trade, including efforts to fix prices, divide markets, allocate production,
or impose boycotts.
|
|
|
2.2.3
Conduct all UIG Membership Meetings, Board of Officers Meetings and Executive Committee
Meetings pursuant to written agendas distributed in advance, to the extent possible, to
members expected to attend. Written minutes shall be prepared and filed by the Secretary
and distributed to all members.
|
|
|
2.2.4
Consult the UIG "Guide to Antitrust Compliance" and its Antitrust Counsel if any
questions should arise from time to time pertaining to the UIGs membership
eligibility requirement, adoption of codes or standards, participation in cooperative
research agreements, participation in statistical exchange programs, or other matters
related to UIG activities having possible antitrust involvement.
|
|
7.7
|
UIG Guide to Antitrust Compliance
|
|
7.7.1 |
Background
|
|
|
Competition is the cornerstone of the free
enterprise system in the United States. It assures all purchasers free choice in the goods
or services purchased. It also motivates each seller to strive to improve the quality of
goods and services offered. The federal and state antitrust laws are designed to provide a
framework for this free enterprise system. The Utility Industry Group (UIG) directs that
its members and staff abide by these laws.
|
|
|
7.7.1.1
The Charter and Mission of the UIG specifically prohibits ". . . its members,
Directors and elected Officers or staff from engaging in any activity or conduct which has
the effect, intent, or even the appearance of restraining trade, including efforts to fix
prices, divide markets, allocate production or impose boycotts."
|
|
|
7.7.1.2
UIG's operating policies are based upon a fundamental and abiding respect for the law and
a belief that UIG's overall interests can best be served by strict adherence to the
antitrust laws. Thus, an increased awareness of permissible, questionable and prohibited
conduct is one of UIG's goals. UIG desires to provide its members and staff with this
antitrust policy guide which summarizes the antitrust laws and explains the pitfalls which
may await those whose activities are found to violate those laws. It is important to
remember that the complexities and subtleties of antitrust made a "do-it-yourself
kit" for its interpretation virtually impossible. Nevertheless, it is hoped and
expected that this guide will help each of our members recognize antitrust questions when
they arise. No action which may be questionable under the antitrust laws should be taken
before the matter has been reviewed by the Chairman of UIG, and at the President's
discretion, by UIG Antitrust Counsel.
|
|
7.7.2 |
The Antitrust Laws
|
|
|
7.7.2.1
The basic federal antitrust law is the Sherman Act. Phrased in broad, constitutional-like
terms, it outlaws agreements or conspiracies to restrain competition in both interstate
and, in certain situations, foreign commerce. It also prohibits acts of monopolization
conducted individually or as a part of a group. Section 1 of the Sherman Act makes illegal
any contract, combination or conspiracy which unreasonably restrains trade. Section 1 is
directed to combinations formed by competitors whose effect or purpose is to limit or
inhibit competition among them. There are certain categories of activities which the law
will find unreasonable under Section 1 by the mere proof of their existence. These are the
so-called "per se" violations of Section 1. "Per se" violations
include agreements among competitors to fix prices, allocate territories, allocate
production, or boycott third parties.
|
|
|
7.7.2.2
Section 2 of the Sherman Act prohibits monopolization, attempts to monopolize or
combinations to monopolize any line of commerce. Oftentimes, the same facts which
constitute a violation of the restraint of trade provisions of Section 1 are sufficient to
constitute a violation of the monopoly provisions of Section 2.
|
|
|
7.7.2.2.1
Criminal penalties apply to violations of the Sherman Act. It is a felony to violate
either Section 1 or Section 2 of the Sherman Act. A fine of up to $1,000,000 for
corporations and $100,000 for individuals and imprisonment of not more that three years or
both for individuals may be imposed upon conviction.
|
|
|
7.7.2.3
The Sherman Act was enacted in 1890. In 1914, Congress passed the Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) Act and the Clayton Act. Section 5 of the FTC Act prohibits "unfair methods of
competition and deceptive acts or practices in commerce." This provision is meant to
prohibit activities which in themselves are violations or which, if allowed to continue,
would evolve into violations of the antitrust laws. Thus, Section 5 of the FTC Act covers
violations of the "spirit" of the Sherman or Clayton acts and activities which
fall into gaps in these acts.
|
|
|
7.7.2.4
The Clayton Act has more than 20 sections. The most important to the activities of UIG and
its members are Section 2, 3, and 7 which deal with price discrimination, tying and
exclusive dealing arrangements, and mergers. Section 2 of the Clayton Act was completely
superseded by the Robinson-Patman Act of 1936. The Robinson-Patman Act essentially
requires a manufacturer to treat each level of customer equally with respect to prices and
price-related services.
|
|
|
7.7.2.5
The antitrust laws may be enforced by either of two federal government agencies: the
Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission. In
addition, private lawsuits by individuals or by state attorneys general on behalf of their
citizens (so called "parens-patriae" suits) may be brought to recover three
times the actual civil damages as well as attorneys' fees and costs. There have also been
situations in which courts have ordered trade associations dissolved. The FTC Act is
enforced only through administrative proceedings conducted by and within the Federal Trade
Commission, and only the Department of Justice may bring criminal actions under the
Sherman Act. Many states, including Colorado, also make it a criminal offense to violate
state antitrust laws.
|
|
7.7.3 |
Conduct to be Followed at UIG Meeetings
|
|
|
7.7.3.1
It is well recognized that trade associations serve valid business objectives. As an
industry organization, UIG may legally and quite properly engage in a variety of
activities to serve the common interests of its members. However, antitrust laws require
that the activities of the UIG members, as well as those of the UIG, to be structured so
as not to prevent or discourage competition. Accordingly, UIG offers the following advice
to its members with respect to their participation in UIG activities.
|
|
|
7.7.3.1.1
Do refer all UIG matters having potential antitrust implications to the Chairman of UIG.
Matters to be referred would include those in which there is any suggestion of a
discussion of prices among UIG members, agreements to divide markets or customers,
allocation of production and boycotts or refusals to deal with prospective customers.
|
|
|
7.7.3.1.2
Do follow previously published agendas for all annual meetings, Board meetings, Executive
Committee, Steering Committee and Committee meetings of UIG. Such meetings shall be
conducted pursuant to previously published agendas, and written minutes shall be prepared
for each of these meetings.
|
|
|
7.7.3.1.3
To the extent possible, do conduct all other committee meetings pursuant to written
agendas and prepare written minutes (which shall be filed with UIG) for each of these
meetings.
|
| |
|
7.7.3.1.4
Do avoid loose, careless or flippant remarks, especially in correspondence, that can pose
an antitrust problem for UIG if examined out of context at a later date.
|
|
|
7.7.3.1.5
Do not discuss, agree or enter into any arrangement or contract with anyone who competes
with you regarding your prices. This should preclude any discussion of competitive factors
which may influence cost such as production costs, discounts, transportation or credit
terms. Even gossiping or jesting about prices with competitors may be construed or
inferred later to have been part of a scheme to fix prices.
|
|
|
7.7.3.1.6
Do not exchange or discuss any competitive information when dealing with competitors.
|
|
|
7.7.3.1.7
Do not agree with your competitors to limit production, fix production quotas, or
otherwise limit the supply of any product.
|
|
|
7.7.3.1.8
Do not contact competitors with regard to future prices or other terms of sale to
customers.
|
|
|
7.7.3.1.9
Do not discuss or enter into any agreement to allocate production. Such agreements have
often resulted in stabilizing commodity prices at an artificially high level.
|
|
|
7.7.3.1.10
Do not discriminate in your treatment of competing customers or suppliers.
|
|
|
7.7.3.1.11
Do not enter into exclusive dealing arrangements whereby one company requires as a
condition of sale or purchase that another company deal exclusively with it, or agree not
to deal with the company's competitors.
|
|
|
7.7.3.1.12
Do not provide any customer with the understanding that the customer will sell your
product or serve only at certain prices or in certain markets or to persons specified by
you.
|
|
|
7.7.3.1.13
Do not assume that business outside the United States is exempt from the United States
antitrust laws.
|
|
|
7.7.3.1.14
Do not try to guess what the law is; when in doubt, get help. Approaches by UIG and its
members to legislative, administrative or judicial arms of government are ordinarily
protected from being considered antitrust violations even when they may necessarily result
in a disadvantage to competitors of UIG members. This is because the Supreme Court has
held that the First Amendment right to petition government ordinarily supersedes the
antitrust prohibitions against joint action that results in injury to competitors when the
First Amendment right is utilized. It is clear, however, that "sham" activities
designed to restrain competition or other improper activities to influence government must
be avoided.
|
|
7.7.4 |
Conclusion
|
|
|
7.7.4.1
The nation's antitrust laws are quite complex. This guide is only a very basic
introduction to a complex subject. It is UIG's intent that, by distributing this material
to its members, each of them will be alerted to the antitrust issues that may arise during
the course of their business or the business of the UIG.
|
|
7.8 |
UIG Best Practices
|
|
7.8.1 |
Implementation Guidelines
|
|
|
The UIG has developed a group of document
conventions through a process of member consensus using four basic tenets. These tenets
establish both a basis for our shared vision of EDI and a structure for its implementation
within the electric, gas, and combination utility industry. It is also recognized that
individual trading partner implementations must provide a balance between the shared
vision and the practical limitations that may exist for a time with one or both trading
partners. For this reason, the UIG has developed best practice recommendations to assist
the trading partners in utilizing the document conventions.
|
|
7.8.2 |
Basic Tenets
|
|
|
7.8.2.1
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) is the exchange of routine business transactions in a
standardized computer processable format.
|
|
|
7.8.2.2
All document conventions will be based on ANSI ASC X12. The UIG will neither recommend nor
support the use of any non compliant transactions.
|
|
|
7.8.2.3
Implementation Guidelines and Document Conventions are recommendations based on the
experiences and best judgment of its members. Though not mandatory, the UIG encourages
their adoption in the absence of any overriding business needs of the trading partners.
|
|
|
7.8.2.4
The UIG currently recommends the use of ANSI ASC X12 version 3030. Trading partners
implementing a new EDI program or documents should utilize 3030 if possible and we
encourage existing members to migrate to this version and release.
|
|
7.8.3 |
Best Practices
|
|
|
The UIG has established best practices which
address the use and purpose of transaction sets that are exchanged between trading
parties. Best practices can be grouped into two categories: global and document-specific.
Global best practices are presented within this section and also within each UIG
transaction set. Global best practices govern the use and purpose of all established UIG
transaction sets. Document-specific best practices are itemized within the particular
transaction set, where the best practice explicitly addresses that transaction.
|
|
|
7.8.3.1 Use of Text Segments The UIG
recommends that the note (NTE) segment be avoided because this segment is not machine
readable. Other text segments, such as MSG and PID, may be used if their use will lead to
machine-processable information in subsequent applications.
|
|
|
7.8.3.2 Use of the ZZ Qualifier The use
of data fields to transmit uncoded or textual information should be avoided. This practice
is usually associated with the use of the ZZ qualifier as a normal course of doing
business.
|
|
|
7.8.3.3 TS 997 - Functional
Acknowledgment The purpose of the 997 is to verify receipt of a
transmitted document only - not the acceptance of the document. For example, the
acceptance of a purchase order (850) is accomplished through the use of the purchase order
acknowledgment (855).
|
|
|
7.8.3.4 Interchange Control Number An
unique and sequential Interchange Control Number should be used on every envelope that is
transmitted to a trading partner. This approach will allow the receiver to audit the
interchange for any non-unique or missing transmissions.
|
|
|
7.8.3.5 Use of Dun & Bradstreet (DUNS) Number A Dun & Bradstreet (DUNS) number should be used to identify the trading
partners. D&B assigns a nine-digit identifier to each trading partner. The trading
partner then assigns a four-digit suffix (DUNS+4) to uniquely identify a specific
location.
|
|
|
7.8.3.6 Banking Transactions Guidelines
that outline the use of transactions relating to interactions between a sender and the
sender's financial institution are available from the Banker's EDI Council and the
NACHA EDI Council. Other publications that address the use of financial payment
transactions include Technical Report 1 (TR 1) and Technical Report 2 (TR2).
Both publications are available from DISA.
|